Michiel de Jong
Michiel de Jong
> there is not one Solid spec, but a group of orthogonal specifications making up what we momentarily define to be Solid, and what the Solid test suite can verify...
This would be for version 0.8 of the spec then. We need to discuss the timeline for that. I agree with Ruben about removal of globbing in the next spec...
Good point. I should also specify that if an app send `sub https://example.com/` it will not receive notifications about each change on that storage server; only about the ones it...
Added this to the agenda for this week's call.
IMHO those are all very good questions, but way too high-level for this spec to answer. We could add a note in the introduction that this spec doesn't currently solve...
I think of the 5 issues mentioned, only https://github.com/solid/solid-spec/issues/167 is still undecided, and I'm not aware of any other points on which the spec is currently unclear. So as soon...
Status update: * [ ] [webid-oidc client_id's](https://github.com/solid/webid-oidc-spec/pull/16) -> @jaxoncreed I reviewed your PR, can you have a look? * [ ] [WAC-Allow headers](https://github.com/solid/solid-spec/pull/178) -> I requested a review from @dmitrizagidulin...
We still have disagreement from @fabiancook and @RubenVerborgh on container-deletion (first about recursiveness, second about required ACL mode)
During today's meeting, as I was explaining the clarification project, it occurred to me that probably what Solid app developers rely on is not so much this spec's text, or...