Michael Staib

Results 571 comments of Michael Staib

We are discussing a new `PatchInputType` at the moment. The idea described here has to many issues we see, but we recognize the need for a higher level patch type....

I have to look at this again. In my mind I never expected people to hook interfaces in here.

We still have this on the back log. I will soon start work on the defer / stream part and then we will have a look at this.

I had a stab at this one and we have a rough idea but it also has a lot of implications. To stop the mutation flow here we actually need...

This would create a non-spec compliant GraphQL server. We have discussed this in the working group and all agreed that it should not be a default in a GraphQL server....

You can adopt the new spec directive, but having it as default is not a good idea.

However, with a header you can move this into the network layer and no one has to think about it.

Can you post a link to the rfc?

Lets see ... what I can include is a header approach at the moment. I can see that we include the draft with V14 but the new syntax `!String` seems...