Michael Quigley

Yup! Just a basic plumbing thing. However, we need #529 implemented before the frontend would react instantly. Same issue, different set of circumstances.

This is already implemented and working well.

What is the thought process? What are we trying to accomplish with this PR?

Will be considered as part of a larger effort to revist the Ziti network lifecycle concepts alongside future `zrok` goals (#301). Backlog for `v0.5` for now.

Also, incorporate whatever level of inspection and visibility is possible through the web console.

Related #593

Consolidating into #301.

We'll take a look at this as part of the upcoming `v0.5` work.

For `v0.4`, we can (and probably should) conditionally use a different storage implementation for PostgreSQL versus SQLite. The PostgreSQL version can do the `SELECT ... FOR UPDATE`, and the SQLite...

This looks like a simple enough change. Might hold off until after the `v0.4.0` release... save it for a point release. Need to consider how we'll want to migrate existing...