privacy-model
privacy-model copied to clipboard
A Potential Privacy Model for the Web: Sharding Web Identity
Hi @michaelkleber , Following some of our previous discussions, I went back to your "privacy model" explainer, which I believe to be the most representative definition of "privacy" used to...
Section "Third Parties can be allowed access to a first-party identity" says: > This recognizes that composability is central to the Web — for example, it is unreasonable to expect...
Discussion thread is here: https://github.com/bslassey/privacy-budget/issues/2
The text uses these terms loosely and it is unclear what is meant by them. It refers to the Mozilla and WebKit anti-tracking policies which for example use slightly different...
From the text: "This document offers one possible answer to these questions. The goal is a balanced way forward, dramatically improving web privacy while allowing enough information flow to carefully...
Let's consider the following attack scenario: * The user goes to site.example and login using a third-party login.adtech.example frame. * site.example has a first-party script from analytics.adtech.example/analytics.js. * After the...
> "This document describes a way the web could potentially work that would not require cross-site tracking, but would still let publishers support themselves with effective advertising." Why is advertising...
After sharding is applied, I believe there are three distinct contexts a third party can operate in. Perhaps it's easier to think about changes when they're grouped in these buckets?...
The "Third Parties can be allowed access to a first-party identity" section is confusing. In https://twitter.com/Chronotope/status/1164574958061797378 et seq. Aram Zucker-Scharff read it as implying that the 1p tells its 3p's...
What is "effective advertising" as is referred to in the text? > This document describes a way the web could potentially work that would not require cross-site tracking, but would...