Michael Brown

RFC 3339 describes the Internet Date/Time Format which conforms to ISO 8601. What is this issue proposing to change? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3339#section-5.6

I've updated #119 to reflect the views of the community from the meeting notes. I think it should be ready to be merged once folks have a chance to take...

Maybe I'm missing something. Can someone explain (or point me to) what the difference is? RFC 3339 says: > The following profile of ISO 8601 [[ISO8601](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3339#ref-ISO8601)] dates SHOULD be used...

Does either standard guarantee that you'll be able to sort without processing? Looking at your [comparison chart](https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/#:~:text=RFC%203339%20is%20case%2Dinsensitive,the%20standard%20allows%20arbitrary%20precision), something like `20220714T092455.405000` would also be ISO8601 compliant. I think we have to...

I would prefer not encouraging registries to do more (potentially unnecessary) work on any of the APIs in the "pull" workflow. Some clients will need this information, but (IMO) most...