Michael Aufreiter

Results 108 comments of Michael Aufreiter

> And one more thing to keep in mind (did not find a more appropriate place to put this example, feel free to move to correct thread if need be):...

@Melissa37 thank you! We are working on improving the wording for more clarity. We also moved "Figure Attachments" into a separate feature ticket. #1289. Please have a look, but no...

Would make sense to exclude the footnote from TextureJATS and only have the deceased flag set. If needed the translation could provide both the flag + a generated footnote with...

Ok, then please specify the text and we can provide a proposal for this.

Well then this is already implemented. :) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2931/56310688-c9a5b600-614c-11e9-9e00-cf8f5e8b568b.png)

Thanks for the requirements on this. Very clear and make sense! Just a few questions: - is the contrib group type 'peer-review' generic enough? - will we have a fixed...

Looking good. I think we already address this (except for the translation layer requirements). Could you verify if the following fields we use currently are sufficient: ```js Organisation.schema = {...

> @Melissa37, @oliver---- - On reviewing the requirements/user stories that @source-data have in #1245, I think it is important that we distinguish two different kinds of data that can be...

Hi @jcolomb! We are aware of this, and we still have not decided how to handle this situation. At the first glance it may seem that the assets could be...

@NickDuf can you have a look if you see issues with those? It would be good to merge this with the consortium-generated user stories.