Micael Levi L. Cavalcante

@H4ad > let the user change that implementation thinking better now, can't we instead expose such feature like this: ```ts // User-land code class InternalModuleTokenFactory implements Something { /* ......

it would parse and validate an `string` in ISO 8601 into `Date` obj?

got you but I'm not sure about changing the `DefaultValuePipe` because there's no way to know which behavior the dev want to have. I mean, since we are supporting functions...

> I am already using the library's DefaultValuePipe and it works fine. yeah but that's because your `ParseDatePipe` is aware of that, which is something too specific. I mean, people...

@davidgonmar I'd await for Kamil

@davidgonmar if you don't mind on writing a PR that can be rejected, go ahead :)

tbh I don't know if we should or not do that. I'll leave this decision up to Kamil. What I found a bit off is that we one for UUID...

for now you can use `--ignore-scripts` to skip that

@ReneZeidler can you please rebase your branch?

@vahidvdn feel free to propose an improvement to the docs here: https://github.com/nestjs/docs.nestjs.com via pull request