Michael Hucka

Here's a proposed process for the removal: - [ ] Create a branch in the Cirq git repository with a meaningful name (perhaps cirq-rigetti-before-removal). This will act as a snapshot...

@RahilJain1366 For planning purposes, could you let us know the status of this? Are you still working on this?

@RahilJain1366 I think you're right. I just tested it in Python 3.11.9 on Linux by - commenting out the xfail annotations in `cirq-core/cirq/transformers/analytical_decompositions/quantum_shannon_decomposition_test.py` - installing NumPy 1.26 instead of 2.x...

@NoureldinYosri Very gentle ping …

What about this alternative idea: make the color of the 0's be a shade of gray. Example to illustrate what it might look like: This could be done automatically. If...

Update: I've spent some time studying the feasibility of this. I've worked out how to do it in LaTeX, but after studying the way docs are built for Cirq, it...

> I don't think it's worth doing this for 1-qubit or 2-qubit gates. If we can do the grayed out version as per [@mhucka[](https://teams.googleplex.com/[email protected])](https://github.com/mhucka) that would be great, but otherwise...

> Yes, that’s a good point. It’s probably better to update to the latest version. It’s just what was internally deployed I think was the older one. The new version...

> @mhucka No, the PR as it stands is compatible with colab. It's just that for controlled gates the dot looks a little funny due to the old specification. However,...

@zlatko-minev I was holding off approving it because there are comments by @dstrain115 in the review that have not been addressed: * https://github.com/quantumlib/Cirq/pull/7354/files#r2094138349 * https://github.com/quantumlib/Cirq/pull/7354/files#r2094139042