Matt Holt
Matt Holt
Beat me to it, but yeah I think symmetry with the xcaddy CLI would be a good idea. `package@ref` syntax.
@mohammed90 I'm now reconsidering this. I don't think we should count them as normal config modules (because they are not). Maybe we should rip out the linked code (if possible,...
@mohammed90 > Do you mean it'll be in the response Accept header when the user calls the endpoint with either GET or HEAD? Yep. HEAD probably. That way you can...
> Not sure if you remember, but you implemented support for Content-Type: text/. Yeah, but that doesn't tell you what adapters are available. I just am suggesting that if you...
> That feels wrong. The HEAD idea is very cool. I'm suggesting both should be possible. If your adapter is already installed, then you don't need an extra HEAD request...
Thank you Mark! And thanks @darkweak for maintaining this :blush:
#Thanks for opening an issue! We'll look into this. It's not immediately clear to me what is going on, so I'll need your help to understand it better. Ideally, we...
I'm not sure I understand. can you explain your question more?
Hmm yeah I don't think we've exposed something quite like this. PRs welcomed, or a PoC in a separate repo, or something!
Thanks for bringing this up! I would be happy to add metrics, but I just don't know how. 😅 Would you like to submit a PR? I'm hoping they will...