Mark Headd

Relevant to this discussion? https://github.com/digital-preservation/csv-schema

Super simple, and probably not ideal. But, it's a start. https://github.com/mheadd/blds-validator

@ejaxon Ah, I can see why the relationship issue would be important given that you are using GraphQL. Will be interesting to see that when it's ready. Can you share...

@ejaxon In the interim, I've labeled this for consideration as an enhancement so we can take it up in the next round of changes.

@adamajm That's a good question. The field is not required, and there is also an optional `Publisher` field. There are [several examples](http://www.civicdata.com/dataset?groups=blds-building-permit-data) of jurisdictions publishing BLDS data without that field....

@coshman Thanks for adding this observation. I've added a couple of labels to help get discussion started on this. Do others have thoughts? /cc: @eddietejeda @axtheset

@Johnnygard Sorry about the delayed response. This is an interesting idea for an enhancement. Do you have a sense for how common the community/subdivision/neighborhood name is in permit data? Also,...

@bettin - a good question. It does feel a little confusing sometimes differentiating between 'building permits' used generically and permits for constructing a building. Perhaps we can offset this some...

@dvdhns What permit type, or - more accurately - what `PermitTypeMapped` value would such a project use? Interested in how frequent an occurrence this would be for you.

@ejaxon This was an idea that was floated a while ago as a possible application of BLDS data across jurisdictions. Not sure if there is still interest here. I do...