Try fewer state features?

[kxxwz]

Hi @mhauskn. Thanks a lot for your work. I’m curious about one thing. By HFO manual, there are 58(+1) state features for only-one-offense-player setting, but these features are over complete, as written in the manual. For example, we only need 2 features to locate the position of one player, but there are much more Landmark and Proximity features. Have you considered or tried using fewer state features?

[mhauskn]

Hi Hongjie, you are correct - the features in HFO are designed to be overcomplete, because neural networks are able to handle redundant information gracefully. I have not tried using fewer state features, but I suspect that it would be entirely possible.

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 3:15 PM Hongjie [email protected] wrote:

Hi @mhauskn https://github.com/mhauskn. Thanks a lot for your work. I’m curious about one thing. By HFO manual, there are 58(+1) state features for only-one-offense-player setting, but these features are over complete, as written in the manual. For example, we only need 2 features to locate the position of one player, but there are much more Landmark and Proximity features. Have you considered or tried using fewer state features?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mhauskn/dqn-hfo/issues/35, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABNOeaeTBD2opkdU4l3E4cImpNXqD44ks5uOhGHgaJpZM4Vy-Wt .