Michael Haggerty

~~This is a great idea?~~ :point_left: _typo, sorry!_ This is a great idea! :point_left: _corrected_ Wouldn't we want some kind of custom error message explaining that the reason for the...

I admit that `cmd_list()` was a kludge, but instead of turning its reading part into a separate function, I think it would be better to build a more robust way...

I don't use submodules myself. So I can't judge whether that change would be wanted by _all_ submodules users. Do you have an opinion about that? Would setting `git config...

I agree that it's harder than necessary to find the existing `--forget` option. OTOH I'm worried that tacking it on to `forget-results` would be dangerous if the `forget-results` default is...

Thanks for your comments and the spike implementation! Sorry I haven't been more responsive but I've been very busy lately. I think this is a great idea and it's one...

Cool, I like the idea (especially the :cry: sad trombone :trumpet: part)! Ideally, something like this would somehow be hooked into the `post-commit` hook (and possibly `post-applypatch`, `post-receive`, ... what's...

> Perhaps something like `inotifywait` could be used to look for updates to `HEAD` or to `$(git symbolic-ref HEAD)`. I'd prefer something more portable. > Regarding output of the cache,...

Thanks! I think that I'll skip the Actions automation; i.e., I'll end up merging the first three of your patches but not the fourth. What is your rationale for requiring...

@tucked: thanks, that would be helpful. Bonus points if the instructions are simple enough that a 5-year-old can understand them, since I've not been active in the Python community for...

Do you have `whenmerged.default.pattern` configured? If so, it might be causing `git when-merged` to look for the commit in a different branch than the one that you are on when...