Marc Gravell

That's brilliant context, thanks. Will look at that scenario in the week. On Fri, 11 Mar 2022, 21:19 ctrondse, ***@***.***> wrote: > @ctrondse Unfortunately I was never able to >...

Thanks for the gentle nudge. My bad; I will try to look tomorrow (famous last words) Sorry for the delay, but sadly this is not my official day job, do...

We try very very hard to avoid MME problems, so unless we already have a necessary "major" (break), it is preferred to do this in a way that doesn't break...

We know that `WAIT` is a problem. We have investigated some alternative internal implementations that will enable `WAIT` and other blocking operations - essentially, switching to a connection pool internally....

No, I was going to do this as 2.2, and the proof-of-concept is complete - it just needs integrating and testing, but: this isn't my only project and isn't my...

That Lua script will block your entire server, and could even get forcibly terminated. I don't recommend that. On Thu, 19 Aug 2021, 19:19 Mikael Elkiær, ***@***.***> wrote: > Does...

Honestly, until I get the time to implement pooled connections: I am not, in any scenario, going to advocate anything that introduces a blockage at the server, no matter how...

some of the overall counters already exist via `GetCounters`; timing, however, is relatively expensive to gather *and* quite hard to accurately summarise - I'd be cautious of that one; it...

GetCounters is client metrics, not server metrics - where (just to be 100% clear) the library (and whatever you're doing with it) is a *client* in this context, and the...

I'm not familiar. Link? On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, 15:22 Vlad Kovalev, wrote: > @mgravell have you looked into App.Metrics? > e.g. using their histogram metric would help to put...