FR: Literature Note Integration

[chrisgrieser]

trafficstars

given that many people have their literature notes in a dedicated folder and with the citekey as filename, wouldn't it make sense to somehow integrate literature notes as well? Typing [@Kieser2006a] [[Kieser2006a]] all the time is a bit tedious, and also somewhat redundant.

Some ideas:

• display whether a citation has a literature note, e.g. with an icon (or cssclass for us theme devs)
• link/method to directly open the literature note.
• all while not changing the text in the markdown – for pandoc export, there should still only ever be [@Kieser2006a]

[mgmeyers]

I've been thinking about this, too @chrisgrieser. Would we assume literature notes are only one of:

• @citekey.md
• citekey.md

I imagine a lot of folks use other names. I can see looking up literature notes by a citekey metadata field, but I don't think there's a performant way of retrieving a file by metadata field. Maybe the above is the best way to start.

[chrisgrieser]

yeah, for starters, those two will be totally fine, I think!

[lguenth]

It looks terrible but typing links as [[litnote|[@citekey]]] does technically work. Edit: Wait, I didn't realize that [[litnote|@citekey]] also works. :facepalm:

[FeralFlora]

This has been implemented right? So I think both this issue and #54 can be closed, unless there is some intention to expand the file names supported and implement the indicator that @chrisgrieser mentioned (if that was meant to be shown at the citation). Well, the tooltip has the literature note link too, so?