Michael Frey

> theoretically yes, but once the function ccnl_mkInterest() returns, the opts value is never used again. It's only used for marshalling the packet in ccnl_ndntlv_prependInterest. No references are saved for...

Personally, I think this might change how you use CCN-lite, since you **don't** want to 1. make the free'd data structures parameters of functions, e.g. ``` C 226 int 227...

> However, I will check that to make the code in the 'master' compiling on Mohave again. Is there any update? Shall I still look investigate the issue?

What is the status of NFN in CCN-lite? Who is the maintainer (I assume it's you)? Do you want to maintain it? Do you think it is maintainable? I don't...

@blacksheeep It's up to you? You can proactively ask somebody in your research group/community (who is using NFN in ccn-lite) if he/she wants to takeover the maintenance. If nobody wants...

After a brief discussion we agreed that this not vulnerability but a bug. As far as I can see throughout the code base ``ccnl_ndntlv_prependBlob`` is used with safe parameter settings,...

I've uploaded the code for this example over [here](https://github.com/mfrey/backyard/tree/master/content).

So we can agree that It is pointing to the wrong position in the buffer and make it a bug?

I've clearly underestimated the work load. This is clearly going to take some time. I've put up a preliminary (obviously) [development procedures](https://github.com/cn-uofbasel/ccn-lite/wiki/Development-procedures) wiki page which in turn point to non-existing...

I've also added the [community process](https://github.com/cn-uofbasel/ccn-lite/wiki/Community-processes). If you have some time, please go over the two pages and make changes or propose changes over here. I'm not entirely sure about...