Mike Fikes

> Thank you for supplying yet another interestingly strange instrument 😁 -- it seems there is no danger at all of pymeasure just obtaining the N+1st driver for a power...

@bilderbuchi Yeah, I don' mind taking a stab at this. With #516 I encountered a non-SCPI instrument, but that one didn't present so much difficulty since it is ASCII based...

When I checked, I think the only thing that would need to be changed is to deal with `pjstadig.humane-test-output` not supporting self-hosted. (In the `tach`-based suite it is simply omitted.)

Thanks @wirthi. Likewise, if you happen to find any particular code constructs that ClojureScript (and really, Google Closure Compiler) are emitting that are problematic from a perf perspective, that would...

Wow! If you assume that Node 8.11.1's performance is equivalent to the V8 number I had obtained, and extrapolating, you'd get this updated chart with Graal.JS matching SpiderMonkey's perf. ...

Here is a chart comparing Nashorn and Graal.JS master warmup curves. _x_-axis is iteration and _y_-axis is the number of milliseconds needed to run the ClojureScript unit tests. 

@thomaswue For these tests, Graal.JS is currently within the golden ratio of JavaScriptCore perf, so it seems within reach. 👍

@woess Yeah, as a separate concern, the tests should pass. In ClojureScript's CI we currently [grab graalvm-ce-1.0.0-rc1](https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/blob/3123aa32851c01682cf076e0e3b497e890b26922/.travis.yml#L17) and [run the tests](https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/blob/3123aa32851c01682cf076e0e3b497e890b26922/.travis.yml#L58-L59). They currently all pass. @woess Sorry, adding to the...

Here is an updated chart showing perf with RC8:  Underlying data: |Engine | ms| -- | -- | CE | 1763 | |CE --jvm | 982 | | EE...

Updated Chart for RC12:  Underlying data: |Engine | ms| -- | -- | CE | 1894 | |CE --jvm | 955 | | EE | 1402 | | EE...