Martin Hepp

In general. I agree that many of the elements for marking up Web page structure information are confusion and hardly useful for a consumer of markup, because the same information...

I know that some Linux admins prefer installing Python packages via `apt`, but IMHO and from a Python perspective, this is not a very good approach, because it means that...

Thanks, @gkellogg ! But do you agree with my general proposal to be very reluctant to add properties for temporal and other meta-data and plan for the use of RDF-star...

FYI: Some more background from a schema.org perspective of the problem is in https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/3408#issuecomment-1816721399.

Quick and practical advice for this and similar data validation tasks: **You need to produce your custom SHACL shapes definitions**, either manually or derived from the RDFS or OWL vocabulary...

Quick comment (had no time to review the entire discussion in detail): Historically, we had some product properties at the level of offer. The genesis was that the old rdf-vocabulary...

Here is a link to the core GoodRelations model: http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Documentation/Conceptual_model The Wiki content there has been converted to static HTML, hence the layout and inclusion of figures may be broken....

URIs from http://www.productontology.org solve exactly this problem. They are defined as proper classes on the basis of Wikipedia lemmata and hence avoid all of the problems sketched above.

> Though if you don't mind me asking, in your opinion, how would you suggest using WikiData or DBPedia concept URIs (besides as `@id` values), are there ways of making...

> Taking all the comments into account the correct answer is... 😉 > > `"@type": ["SportsClub","http://www.productontology.org/id/Health_club"]` Yes, exactly. And don't be irritated that the PTO classes make it a product,...