docs: Governance docs Proposal

[franciscojavierarceo]

What does this PR do?

Proposal for light weight Governance for Llama Stack

Test Plan

N/A

[booxter]

Thank you. I'd like to better understand how the nomination process looks like. In some projects I dealt before, it was an email in a public mailing list; in some others it was a PR / issue posted with the nomination. The document here suggests that voting will be in private. Is nomination in private too then? Or is it different?

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity within 60 days. It will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs within 30 days.

[leseb]

@franciscojavierarceo should we revisit this now?

[franciscojavierarceo]

@leseb I'm mostly indifferent.

Empirically, this doesn't appear to be a priority so I'm okay with revisiting it or closing it.

[leseb]

Re-opening for discussions. I would like to revisit this topic. @ashwinb @raghotham @ehhuang @reluctantfuturist PTAL :)

[mergify[bot]]

This pull request has merge conflicts that must be resolved before it can be merged. @franciscojavierarceo please rebase it. https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/working-with-forks/syncing-a-fork

[leseb]

Reworked and simplified:

• uses a GOVERNANCE.MD
• remove the mention of maintainers but only code owners
• lightweight feature proposal - no RFC
• addressed https://github.com/llamastack/llama-stack/pull/1848#discussion_r2496213536

[leseb]

@raghotham final look? Thanks!