#bug; QiDao data fixes

[melotik]

Describe the bug There was some data that was noticed to be incorrect on QiDao subgraphs, specifically ETH, ARB, OP (but not limited to those)

The issues we have noticed:

• There have been new vaults since the subgraph was last updated, so any new vaults need to be added to the config
• There may be pricing issues (this is unknown), but worth a look at this price on a yearn LINK vault (~$6 on the subgraph, but $LINK is $11 rn)

@ishraq8 or @bye43 for QAing the data. We will re-evaluate to see if this has solved the issues. Or if you notice any other issues while fixing! Thanks

[melotik]

Updates:

• stale prices from vaults not being interacted with on a regular basis -> looking to increase frequency of updates across the subgraph
• Investigating how we calculate revenue to catch any differences: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NC09r701nfiff4vmqDmle_0BINCyvViauCiYeE54YmE/edit?usp=sharing
• Here is the vault info for all of the vaults
• Need to add these networks:
  • base, metis, moonbeam
• No longer supporting fantom, harmony, moonriver
• Full support is: Ethereum, Base, Optimism, Metis, Avalanche, BSC, Gnosis Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Moonbeam

cc @dhruv-chauhan

[bye43]

Will make revenue changes, fix the stale pricing issue, add base, and missing vaults