QUICK
QUICK copied to clipboard
Significant HF energy difference for some molecules
The following two molecules show significant energy differences with respect to reference code. This must be investigated.
HF BASIS=def2-svp cutoff=1.0e-9 denserms=1.0e-6 zmake GRADIENT DIPOLE CHARGE=0
Ca -2.34894 0.18924 -0.07555
Cl -1.24894 0.18924 -0.07555
Cl -3.44894 0.18924 -0.07555
HF BASIS=def2-svp cutoff=1.0e-9 denserms=1.0e-6 zmake GRADIENT DIPOLE CHARGE=0
I -2.16216 0.91498 0.70279
H -1.06216 0.91498 0.70279
Energies:
CaCl2 ref: -1590.60839685, quick: -1590.533430982 diff: -0.07496586799993565 au
HI ref: -296.992367764, quick: -2043.888505221 diff: 1746.8961374570001 au
@Altaimorin This appears to stem from the initial guess. Can you please check what's going in the SAD guess code for HI example?
SCF ENERGY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NCYC ENERGY DELTA_E SCF_TIME DII_CYC DII_TIME O_TIME DIAG_TIME MAX_ERR RMS_CHG MAX_CHG
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 1 -2040.380744134 ------ 0.172 1 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.6272E+01 0.2985E+01 0.2283E+02
| 2 -2043.768739993 0.338800E+01 0.165 2 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.2339E+00 0.1306E+00 0.1098E+01
| 3 -2043.850347725 0.816077E-01 0.166 3 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.5056E-01 0.3669E-01 0.4801E+00
| 4 -2043.859368718 0.902099E-02 0.164 4 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.2142E-01 0.2448E-01 0.3854E+00
| 5 -2043.865000601 0.563188E-02 0.166 5 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.1995E-01 0.2419E-01 0.3483E+00
| 6 -2043.870097138 0.509654E-02 0.167 6 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.1889E-01 0.8742E-01 0.9680E+00
| 7 -2043.884846993 0.147499E-01 0.167 7 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.9728E-02 0.9932E-02 0.6860E-01
| 8 -2043.884911639 0.646455E-04 0.163 8 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.1021E-01 0.6223E-01 0.8700E+00
| 9 -2043.888213285 0.330165E-02 0.165 9 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.1149E-01 0.1307E-02 0.8289E-02
| 10 -2043.888170491 -.427945E-04 0.164 10 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.1246E-01 0.7905E-03 0.6278E-02
| 11 -2043.888123727 -.467639E-04 0.165 1 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.1340E-01 0.6928E-02 0.4988E-01
| 12 -2043.888424822 0.301095E-03 0.165 2 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.5416E-02 0.5137E-02 0.4081E-01
| 13 -2043.888484196 0.593740E-04 0.165 3 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.2299E-03 0.3334E-03 0.3629E-02
| 14 -2043.888484414 0.217477E-06 0.164 4 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.3836E-04 0.3905E-04 0.4516E-03
| 15 -2043.888484418 0.393711E-08 0.163 5 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.1602E-04 0.2045E-04 0.2302E-03
| 16 -2043.888484418 0.512859E-09 0.164 6 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.1641E-05 0.1811E-05 0.1930E-04
| -------------- 2E-INT CUTOFF CHANGE TO 0.1000E-08 ------------
| 17 -2043.888505221 0.208024E-04 0.166 7 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.2940E-06 0.1073E-07 0.9435E-07
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The difference in SCF energy for HI is due to ECPs. The def2-SVP basis set uses an 18-electron ECP for iodine. We do not support ECPs. Iodine was removed from the basis sets.
The difference in SCF energy for CaCl2 persists. This still needs to be investigated.