Andrius Merkys

Can we close this issue as answered, or should we clarify the specification accordingly?

We have revisited the topic in workshop discussion with @rartino and @blokhin and it seems that we arrived to a consensus that we are OK with `assemblies`, `disorder` and `structural_features`...

Thanks for prompt response. > That said, you can insert rows into a database using csvsql, and then dump the database to get the INSERT statements as text. Right, but...

Thanks for this patch. I can confirm this fixes #198.

Yes, TestBigMatrix used to pass on mips64el and ppc64el architectures. Doing some log bisecting I find the following: | Simbody version | C/CXX compiler version | TestBigMatrix | | ---...

I can try disabling optimization for these architectures just to see if that helps. How can I do that?

Just checked, neither `-O1`, nor `-O0` makes TestBigMatrix pass, alas.

@sherm1 sorry for dropping the ball. I believe gcc is the compiler.

This issue seems to have also been reported on the Debian package as [#1070783](https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070783). The Debian bug report also suggests a fix. Can you give it a look?

Great, thanks!