Ed Merks
Ed Merks
Firstly, thanks so much for such a timely response!! 🥇 > > Is there a way to opt of validation for specific know content types? > > No, the only...
Cool idea! 🆒
@angelozerr To me this sounds like a good plan! Other "PDE" files such as *.product, category.xml, feature.xml, and plugin.xml also complain about missing grammars directly in their own structured editors...
It's not so simple to evolve *.exsd. There are many general things that XML Schema allows that make no sense in PDE restricted use case, but maybe that's not a...
Given it's XML content, it wold be kind of odd at this point to change the content type definition to make it no longer XML just to disable errors from...
The proposal here sounds constructive, helpful, and generally useful, but if you think it's best handled by WWD then there is an issue there now.
@angelozerr Thanks again for the help. I'm not sure I understand "closing" the issue without discussion and without creating a followup issue, but hey...
@angelozerr Thanks! 🚀
This is what I tested while investigating how this all works: [repo-sample-asm-with-signing.zip](https://github.com/eclipse/tycho/files/8457176/repo-sample-asm-with-signing.zip) Note that the value `146BA106` in the root pom is a magic number; the last 8 hex digits...
I think consumers will expect the content to be purely the artifacts and not files that are a side-effect of the build process. When publishing to Maven, all artifacts need...