James

Hi @Talkless Thanks for your feedback. First of all, if we are talking about a mono-repo, are you aware of the ongoing incubating "workspace" feature? For the first time, Conan...

Maybe the title of this issue is a bit confusing, it says that ``Conan 2.X is less convenient in monorepo setup``, while it probably refers to "``cmake-conan`` for Conan 2...

> Can you provide examples/explanation on why this "intrusiveness" is bad for them? Sure: "We are not allowed to modify our build scripts or CMakeLists.txt to introduce Conan things, as...

Hi @dograt Thanks for your question. If you want to package some arbitrary files in one package, the easiest way would be some convention, like just packaging them inside the...

Hi @dograt Did the above help? Any further question or comment? Thanks for the feedback

> Specifically, I have a CMake project that needs to access the "resource" files during the configuration stage, and I would like to be able to specify where these files...

Sounds good, don't hesitate to re-open or to create new tickets if you have any further question or issue. Thanks for the feedback!

Hi @Eugene-Alexeev Thanks for your question. I think the problem is that those ``.pc`` files have a dependency to an external ``ProjA-LibA.pc`` file that doesn't exist. Note that such a...

> yes PkgConfigDeps is already called in ProjB's generate(), and it's executing successfully, I just omitted it. I can see both ProjA.pc and ProjA-LibA.pc, hence my expectation that conan will...

Hi @CrustyAuklet Thanks for the feedback. You are right, when using the ``conan_provider.cmake``, the toolchain cannot be passed, because the invocation to Conan happens already from CMake. So with the...