James

> Indeed, it seems to work this way, and all the transitive libs install properly! Super nice!! Great, happy to hear that! > However, if I set app as editable,...

> I'll have a look at this. Re-opening, I am investigating this to try to support editable case for new exe imported targets :)

No prob :) Yes, depending on how it goes, I might open a new ticket, or just use this one. Don't worry about that, I will manage.

Closed by https://github.com/conan-io/conan/pull/18489, the ``self.cpp.build.exe + location`` will work on Conan 2.18 for editable packages. Thanks again for the feedback!

> Would it be possible for the self.cpp.build.location attribute to automatically look inside the full build folder path, like for self.cpp.build.libdirs? Or may I have missed something there? > Same...

Hi @jasal82 Thanks for your question. Yes, when this fix was introduced (to solve grafted commits that happens in CI systems), we thought that https://github.com/git/git/releases/tag/v2.36.0 from April 2022 would be...

> Is the 'old' method functionally equivalent to the --refetch one? Because I understood that --refetch solves problems with negotiation between local and remote repositories. Not really, the old functionality...

Unrelated, but just in case: https://github.blog/open-source/git/securing-git-addressing-5-new-vulnerabilities/ It is likely that at least git>=2.45.1 would be recommended to avoid a series of relatively high severity vulnerabilities

I am proposing https://github.com/conan-io/conan/pull/18501, to fallback to the older way not using ``-refetch``, for cases like this ``git

https://github.com/conan-io/conan/pull/18501 closes this ticket, to be released in next Conan 2.17.1 soon. Thanks for your feedback.