Michael Eliachevitch
Michael Eliachevitch
In case of failed jobs, the gbasf2 backend of b2luigi currently just prints the dictionary of the job status of the failed jobs to stderr. This can be pretty unreadable....
For tasks which use `b2luigi.on_temporary_files`, if the `run`-function fails to produce the temporary outputs, the first error message that the user sees is a `FileNotFoundError` when b2luigi tries to move...
When re-reading the b2luigi [documentation](https://b2luigi.readthedocs.io/en/stable/#why-not-use-the-already-created-batch-tasks), I noticed that @nils-braun had written: > In the future, there will even be an automatic discovery of the batch system to use. The current...
See the [all-contributors specification on github](https://github.com/all-contributors/all-contributors). We put all (even single-commit) contributors into our [the team](https://b2luigi.readthedocs.io/en/stable/#the-team) section on the sphinx documentation anyway, but having them in the README seems to...
Assign this to myself, but @philiptgrace was also interested and asked about the string parsing [here](https://github.com/nils-braun/b2luigi/pull/46#issuecomment-705915640) Interacting with gbasf2 has to be via subprocesses, there is no other way around,...
@bilokin reported that he created a custom database-target found that he had to create a dummy `self.path` attribute and a dummy `makedirs()` method to get it to work, otherwise exceptions...
- Show project name in status - also update progessbar/status when project failed, or is successful and started download (currently, while downloading, it's not updated and shows 1 job as...
When task (with `b2luigi.on_temporary_files` has outputs A and B, and A is missing but B exists, the moving of the temporary files after the task had been successful fails if...
One major task that I would like to do in the future is to introduce proper logging to the gbasf2 batch. When I first wrote it, my idea was that...
See https://github.com/nils-braun/b2luigi/runs/2448812114?check_suite_focus=true I wonder if we can somehow test this easily without doing commits to the workflows. Until this is fixed, I'll publish manually again.