Jack Reed comments

Results 203 comments of


                                            Jack Reed

Move react/react-dom to dev and peer dependencies

Just a friendly ping on this pull request @pbojinov . Is it possible to get this in and a new version released? I'd be happy to help out with any...

Wishlist: field datatype compatibility

Thanks for raising the issue @ShawnWon . We have looked into it, and unfortunately without the Solr statistics being able to be calculated on a `DateRangeField` like it does for...

cluster option does not work properly

Thanks for the bug report. I'm seeing the same thing.

cluster option does not work properly

I'm happy to merge any pull requests but not actively looking at this at the moment.

I want a remote script to be able to access my geo referenced IIIF map

Discussion around both WMS and TMS proxies and the feasibility. The most straightforward approach might be to use ground control points (GCP) to create a GeoTIFF and from there provide...

I want to georeference a IIIF image of a map

The needed information for providing georeferencing of an image: - mask of image (area to be georef, can be whole image) - control points related to geographic space + pixel...

I want to type my geolocation to say what the geolocation says about the resource

Can also be done withing GeoJSON properties

I want to mask the map on the page to have the precise outline of a map to be able to stitch different maps together

Much of this is handled for georeferenced content using approach in #129 .

I want to be able to use a geo coded / geo referenced IIIF resource in a GIS system (industry standard geo tools)

Some description here: https://github.com/IIIF/iiif-stories/issues/128#issuecomment-583664479 Data provided in #129 should enable transformation of content. However, additional services may need to reserve that content.

As a consumer of drag and drop, I want to have confidence that the dragged icon will appear in my viewer

Sure I agree "fixing HTTP/HTTPS on the web" should be out of scope. Let me add to my original comment (after rereading it I agree it may be not that...