Arne Hassel

Any suggestion on how this could be inserted into the specification? Perhaps as an appendix, or should it be more integrated into the specification itself?

@RubenVerborgh Just so I understand the implications of this: Would this mean moving the parts on SPARQL and/or SPARQL UPDATE out of [LDP](https://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/)? Liked this in general because I think...

Also, if yes, that it means moving SPARQL out of LDP, we should thread very carefully. This is functionality that both rdflib.js and LDflex is dependent on, ain't it?

Ok, as long as SPARQL UPDATEs as part of body stays, I don't have any objections ^_^

And thanks for clarifying ^_^

> The WebID needs to be independent from the data storage i.e. Pod in such a way that it is possible to change Pod provider without needing to change WebID...

> > Isnt this server specific? > > Possibly parts of it, but there might also be common things. > Like: what are the accounts on this server? > What...

@jeff-zucker which Content-Type is received when you do the GET for the request? (I suspect it's `application/octet-stream`.)

@jeff-zucker ok, I thought you might get different since we're observing different with the PodBrowser. Weird that there's different behavior.

There is the feature of [`solid:oidcIssuer`](https://github.com/solid/vocab/blob/master/solid-terms.ttl#L170) that should allow users to decouple their Pod and IDP - I know at least @RubenVerborgh uses this in his profile (https://ruben.verborgh.org/profile/#me), but uncertain...