Markus Döring

> With respect to replacement names (nomen novum), the existing definition for originalNameUsage states “… or the senior/earlier homonym for replaced names.” The existence of a senior homonym is the...

> @mdoering, I wonder if your definition change for originalNameUsage really aligns it with originalNameUsageId. It remains a name, while the usage identifier references a name accordingTo some source. The...

I think it's worthwhile capturing the 2 Aus bus examples in examples how one would express these with DwC. My example given using *Usage terms: ``` scientificName,namePublishedInYear,nomenclaturalStatus,originalNameUsage Aus bus Smith,1899,sp.nov,...

@ghwhitbread's example in 2 flavours: ``` scientificName,namePublishedInYear,nomenclaturalStatus,originalNameUsage Aus bus Smith,1899,sp.nov, Zus bus Jones,1904,sp.nov, Aus cus Pyle,1998,nom.nov, Xus bus (Jones) Pyle,2022,comb.nov.,Zus bus Jones ``` ``` taxonID,scientificName,namePublishedInYear,nomenclaturalStatus,originalNameUsageID 1,Aus bus Smith,1899,sp.nov, 2,Zus bus...

Another party using `subtribe` already in a different namespace is WFO. See latest [dwca download](http://www.worldfloraonline.org/downloadData) for their meta.xml from which I quote an excerpt here: ``` ```

interesting case. `BOLD:ADC2696` is not part of the new nub, although it appears in the latest iBOL occurrence dataset: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/search?dataset_key=040c5662-da76-4782-a48e-cdea1892d14c&taxon_key=10051518 It is not part of the BOLD BIN number checklist...

Looks like it. It claims to be from Artsnavnebasn, but the record is gone now

No, it is a plazi source with many spec. names in it and the Gen record that looks bad: https://www.gbif.org/species/204761689 I will block the genus

`Gen Sp` https://www.gbif.org/species/120736467 @myrmoteras the entire dataset looks pretty bad. This treatment only has: ``` Deraeocorinae gen. sp. Unpublished record: [12], 13.i. 2015, 1♀, coll. AK. ```

Indeed the original paper has all these indetermined names in it. It just is like that then. But the scientificName given for the [Gen sp record](https://www.gbif.org/species/120736467/verbatim) is suboptimal. - scientificName:...