Markus Döring

It is basically the same, but without a version: `cc0`, `cc-by`, `cc-by-nc`, etc.

I guess that's not impossible. Though I always wondered what to do with the versioning. Do we really want 4 different ccby licenses and how do they relate?

Yes, that would be fine. And clearly there are subtle differences, otherwise you wouldn't version them. But what would GBIF or other consumers really be doing with these various versions?...

Ah, the license parser indeed maps the older version to UNSUPPORTED. I guess you are right that being more precise is good. I will try my best to adopt the...

That's very useful indeed! I regularly bundke raw data files siuch as db dumps, excel sheets or pdfs with archives if they are not too large. I proposed this also...

would you want to add that much extra data to the archive itself? Maybe a 2nd supplementary archive file might be better in that case. Though keeping it all together...

It is because the metadata file indeed wrongly contains a list for the contact instead of a single object. Would be good to log the problem so it can be...

It is likely a UI change that has some impact. Reading from spreadsheets with multiple sheets is simple. Here is a ColDP example: https://download.checklistbank.org/job/68/68b94afb-d5ce-4a80-8e16-c55e8aa835b6.zip That download format (also as dwca)...

For NomenclaturalChecklist and RegionalChecklist GBIF uses the [DatasetSubtype](https://github.com/gbif/gbif-api/blob/dev/src/main/java/org/gbif/api/vocabulary/DatasetSubtype.java#L28) vocabulary. We do not apply BoR to Taxon records, even though DwC places BoR on record level and thus allows to do...

... or use the [species search API](https://www.gbif.org/developer/species#searching) with [datasetKey=d7dddbf4-2cf0-4f39-9b2a-bb099caae36c](https://www.gbif.org/dataset/d7dddbf4-2cf0-4f39-9b2a-bb099caae36c)