content
content copied to clipboard
Document the the X-Requested-With HTTP header
MDN URL: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers
What information was incorrect, unhelpful, or incomplete?
X-Requested-With link is broken!
Specific section or headline?
It's under Other
What did you expect to see?
documentation about X-Requested-With header
Did you test this? If so, how?
click the link
MDN Content page report details
- Folder:
en-us/web/http/headers
- MDN URL: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers
- GitHub URL: https://github.com/mdn/content/blob/main/files/en-us/web/http/headers/index.html
- Last commit: https://github.com/mdn/content/commit/fc36604b19a172f3fbedb2629e2403180f2eda55
- Document last modified: 2021-03-19T23:16:59.000Z
Yeah the cause is, nobody has yet written the https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/X-Requested-With article.
So the task for whoever works on this would be to write that article.
how do I find out who works on that?
@techsin This is open source, so it could be anyone - you're most welcome to take it on. At some point if my list of things got small enough I might take it on.
Using a link checker found the following headers with broken links. Do we need all of these to have their own:-
- Viewport-Width
- Width
- Max-Forwards
- Origin-Isolation
- X-Download-Options
- X-Permitted-Cross-Domain-Policies
- X-Powered-By
- Last-Event-ID
- Ping-From
- Ping-To
- Report-To
- Sec-WebSocket-Key
- Sec-WebSocket-Extensions
- Sec-WebSocket-Protocol
- Sec-WebSocket-Version
- Accept-Push-Policy
- Accept-Signature
- Push-Policy
- Signature
- Signed-Headers
- Service-Worker-Allowed
- X-Firefox-Spdy
- X-Pingback
- X-Requested-With
- X-Robots-Tag
- X-UA-Compatible
say if someone wanted to fill out the docs, would they be using w3specs as a reference?
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 2:18 AM Himanshu @.***> wrote:
Using a link checker found the following headers with broken links:-
- Viewport-Width
- Width
- Max-Forwards
- Origin-Isolation
- X-Download-Options
- X-Permitted-Cross-Domain-Policies
- X-Powered-By
- Last-Event-ID
- Ping-From
- Ping-To
- Report-To
- Sec-WebSocket-Key
- Sec-WebSocket-Extensions
- Sec-WebSocket-Protocol
- Sec-WebSocket-Version
- Accept-Push-Policy
- Accept-Signature
- Push-Policy
- Signature
- Signed-Headers
- Service-Worker-Allowed
- X-Firefox-Spdy
- X-Pingback
- X-Requested-With
- X-Robots-Tag
- X-UA-Compatible
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mdn/content/issues/4178#issuecomment-846780455, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABDS254ROUJ4JAYDGAAUIPTTPHVT5ANCNFSM43BXTVRQ .
Yes. Though there are plenty of headers that are not in W3C specs - e.g. the Sec-* ones I talk about here: https://github.com/mdn/content/pull/4907#issuecomment-845694070
Further there may be some not even mentioned on MDN yet.
But yes, over time we should aim to document all headers that have been broadly implemented. I will get to Viewport-Width
and Width
sometime soon as part of https://github.com/mdn/content/pull/4907
FYI very soon most of these broken links will start showing up as red links. No link checker required.
Duplicate of https://github.com/mdn/content/issues/1458