browser-compat-data
browser-compat-data copied to clipboard
mdn
sync_event is experimental like SyncEvent and SyncManager
The docs say the ServiceWorkerGlobalScope "sync" event is type SyncEvent and depends on SyncManager, and both of those are experimental technology, so the "sync" event must be experimental too.
per https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data/blob/main/docs/data-guidelines/index.md#setting-experimental, the Background Sync API could be mark as non-experiment, as they are supported by at least one platform and for more then two years (in fact it is eight years).
By that logic SyncEvent and SyncManager should not be labeled experimental. I'm fine with that, so long as these 3 items are in sync, so to speak.
Yes, you can change this PR to label both SyncEvent and SyncManager (and ServiceWorkerRegistration.sync) are not experimental
Yes, per the BCD guidelines, these features should be marked as non-experimental. @sidewayss, would you be down to change this PR (or create a new one) to mark SyncEvent and SyncManager as non-experimental instead?
@sidewayss, would you be down to change this PR (or create a new one) to mark
SyncEventandSyncManageras non-experimental instead?
Sure, I'll try to get to it later today.
I modified this branch to remove my original change and make SyncEvent and SyncManager not experimental. I removed the experimental property from the SyncEvent constructor, but I'm not sure which other properties/methods of both of these to mark as non-experimental. That will require some review from you, @queengooborg. Feel free to make whatever changes those are and merge, otherwise tell me and I'll make them. Thanks.