Matt Haberland

Results 382 comments of Matt Haberland

OK, for now let's xfail the test though so we can merge this.

Hope the thought pans out. Unfortunately, I don't have any ideas. Can you reproduce it on one of your platforms locally?

@mckib2 I removed the `slow` mark to see if this is failing on any other platform.

This is currently not working on some platforms, so that needs to be solved. That said, we could merge this (skipping the test on failing platforms) and leave the underlying...

> The problem on azure build may be that the HiGHS haven't got the time to find at least one feasible solution I'm not sure that's suggested by the failure...

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6570539/193069771-595bd286-c90a-47e2-bc5d-4788539441f4.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6570539/193069835-7fb505b2-cf49-4055-9f4a-5201da89af61.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6570539/193069919-02391b7d-b3c2-4a94-b6ae-32b586876f8f.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6570539/193069988-b72b7a65-29bc-4f62-9fd0-d698444188b1.png) ``` scipy/optimize/_milp.py:362: in milp highs_res = _highs_wrapper(c, indptr, indices, data, b_l, b_u, E Failed: Timeout >60.0s args_iv = (array([-1., -1., -1., -1., -1., -1., -1., -1.,...

I see. Good catch @laenNoCode. I didn't notice that both tests were failing. (How did you test on Azure, BTW?) I updated this to see how that goes. @mckib2, if...

I see that this is very important to you : ) We'll try to make sure this gets fixed for 1.9.2!

OK, the timeout fixed this. @mckib2 are you happy with this? If so, let's get this in so it can be part of 1.9.2.

Done! What I did is just: ``` git checkout expand_opts_for_dbl_tpl_quad git fetch upstream git merge upstream/main git push origin expand_opts_for_dbl_tpl_quad ```