Marco Davids

Keurmerk / Validation icon

8

This is an idea: Provide user with a piece of HTML that he/she can add to own website and that wil show an icon much like the famous HTML-icons: https://www.w3.org/QA/Tools/Icons

On Unbound 1.16.2 I get these warnings in my syslog: ``` Aug 17 12:19:29 doh unbound-telemetry[1111]: WARN [unbound_telemetry::statistics::parser] Unable to parse 'num.query.udpout=2415', unknown key Aug 17 12:20:29 doh unbound-telemetry[1111]: WARN...

Dive deeper in the HTML for IPv6-compatiblity

7

In Dutch: Als je http://example.nl/ opvraagt en in de HTML die dat oplevert zit bijvoorbeeld een verwijzing naar plaatjes, fonts, JavaScript of iets anders dat van een andere website komt...

Typo?

3

Shouldn't it say 'content-type' instead of 'conten-type' ? https://github.com/Cameri/nostream/blob/67ad1eb1d15b570c42343a1a92a2d142110cced4/src/handlers/request-handlers/root-request-handler.ts#L26

[BUG] CSP error on terms.html

2

**Describe the bug** I visited our server https://nostr.example.nl/terms (not it's real name) and got the terms.html, but is was rather simple. As it turns out there are some Content-Security-Policy issues:...

Another "Couldn't retrieve BIND stats, failed to unmarshal XML response"

6

This seems to be a variant on https://github.com/prometheus-community/bind_exporter/issues/69. `Jan 11 13:05:28 xyz prometheus-bind-exporter[55732]: level=error ts=2024-01-11T13:05:28.266Z caller=bind_exporter.go:440 msg="Couldn't retrieve BIND stats" err="failed to unmarshal XML response: strconv.ParseUint: parsing \"-1\": invalid syntax"`...

For discussion: show any existing test results by default?

1

Should we mimic DNSviz behavior and show any existing test results first, instead of immediately initiating a new one (and leave that up to the user)? There is functionality in...

Check for RFC8460, SMTP-TLS reporting (TLS-RPT)

5

Aangezien er gecheckt wordt op STARTTLS / DANE, vroeg ik me af of we niet ook een check moeten toevoegen op het bestaan van SMTP-TLS reporting (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8460.html)? We zouden daar...

RFC9116

2

The website says: "_Just as security.txt can be deployed into either the root or the .well-known directory of a webserver,..._", but with RFC9116 this is no longer true. RFC9116 says:...

Suggestion: do not use the apex approach for deployment

1

See 'txt cnn.com' The apex is already polluted enough as it is. I suggest to only use use the underscored node name '_security'. (normative reference could be: RFC8552)