Mathias Davids

Thanks @najlkin for the recommendations! Just ran a quick test:  The results across the different solvers and pre-conditioners were almost identical, although the `MINRES` and `HypreSmoother` combination really improved...

Hi @mlstowell , I am solving a Darcy type problem (following [ex5p](https://github.com/mfem/mfem/blob/master/examples/ex5p.cpp)) with voltage boundary condition on two ports, and then of course divergence-free `J` is enforced everywhere except on...

Hi @najlkin , thanks a lot for looking into this! The conductivity tensors are all symmetric. They are all 2-rank tensors given by a directional vector `v_par` and two conductivities...

Hi @najlkin , I started to look into the branch `darcy-hdg-dev`. First of all, thanks a lot for putting this together (and of course to everyone else who was involved...

Hi @najlkin , thanks for the quick response! The mesh is a conforming tet-mesh ([this one](https://github.com/mfem/data/blob/master/coil.gen)), although adding non-conforming support would be super helpful -- I used NC meshes very...

Hi @najlkin , thanks for checking in! I had to put this aside for a few days, but just resumed working on this. I am currently trying a few of...

Hi @najlkin , I've done a few more tests, especially comparing my current approach based on `ex5` and `ex5p` in the main branch with `ex5` in `darcy-hdg-dev` that uses the...

Hi @najlkin , just ran a few tests using `ex5-hdg`. As before, the hybridization approach worked slightly better but still not as good as the `ex5p` example in `master` with...

Hi @najlkin , thanks for the helpful comments. Just wanted to test your recommendation (using `MINRES` together with `hybridization`) but the following line is causing an error: ```cpp Verification failed:...

Hi all, just reopened this (same person as @Maatinski but using different account). I am revisiting this point but for a slightly different application. I am still trying to solve...