mcuee
mcuee
Enhancements to the Android backend are welcome. Supporting CMake is out of scope. But adding better support for pkg-config is good.
@xloem Does #874 covers this one? Does #874 cover #31?
@xloem Does #874 covers this one? Does #874 cover #31?
Please refer to #717 as well. https://github.com/libusb/libusb/issues/717
Please refer to #830 first for an propoased updated README if you are interested in using libusb under Android. Then please refer to #874 for better Android support.
There is another approach as mentioned by @normanr here. https://github.com/libusb/libusb/pull/874#issuecomment-873322802 ========== > What normanr is describing appears to be at https://github.com/green-green-avk/libusb-1.0.23-android-helper-service-patch/blob/master/libusb/os/linux_android_helper.c . It's unfortunate that alex initialized a new repository...
Relevant discussion: termux pyusb enhancement https://github.com/pyusb/pyusb/pull/287 https://github.com/pyusb/pyusb/issues/285
https://semver.org/ Semantic Versioning 2.0.0 Summary Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the: - MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes, - MINOR version when you add functionality in a...
https://github.com/a1ien/rusb/issues/53 From @Yatekii > @mcuee it is 100% the clashing dependencies. > > * It is not libjaylink (the C library) but the Rust crate called jaylink. > * It...
It is better to ask in the libusb-devel mailing list for questions.