Matt Connew

We can't change the exception type thrown as there might be someone who is catching this exception, and potentially doing the bad idea of checking the exception message. Whatever we...

Sounds like creating an inner `ProtocolException` is the right solution. Would you be comfortable with creating a PR to make that change? There are two places the change would need...

Yes, please submit a PR, preferably with a test. A believe a test should be simple to write for this scenario.

Yes, that is the problem. ChannelFactory needs to use System.ServiceModel.ServiceContractAttribute and CoreWCF needs to use CoreWCF.ServiceContractAttribute. I actually have a PR right now to allow CoreWCF to use the S.SM...

If you believe you understand what the code is doing, feel free to review it. Basically I'm needing a review for 1. Stupid mistakes. Previously I've accidentally added a local...

Feel free to look at it and if you feel up to reviewing it, go ahead. You can post questions to the PR too if you need some help with...

But please don't feel like you have to. Although personally I sometimes learn new things from reading others code which I then can apply in my own code.

You are trying to use `CoreWCF.ServiceContractAttribute` with `ChannelFactory` which is the wrong way around. Issue #87 allows you to use `System.ServiceModel.ServiceContractAttribute` with CoreWCF.

I checked the package index and I'm seeing the latest packages from Friday. They have the version 0.1.0-alpha.51. You can see the list of packages for CoreWCF.Primitives by following [this...

You look to be doing the right thing. It looks like the problem is your proxy server that you have configured. Here's the relevant part from your logs: ``` Failed...