Matt King

@plweil, sorry it has been almost 5 months with no response. We discussed this topic in today's [authoring practices task force meeting](https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/wiki/September-10%2C-2018-Meeting). Your confusion is understandable. The group agrees we...

Gut reaction 1: this should be an unlabeled input that fails miserably. The fact that we would calculate a label almost seems extreme. Gut reaction 2: I can imagine this...

No concerns; this is an excellent solution!! It will be extremely helpful to have the existing issues linked.

Title is like a fallback in the calculation: only use if there is nothing better, where there is an assumption that accessibility specific attributes are meant for assistive technologies and...

@howard-e Thank you again for the excellent data model documentation. The formatting you did withheadings, tables , and lists makes it easy to read with a screen reader. I've now...

@mcking65 wrote: >5. Vendor review status (vendors review specific versions of a test plan, not a report. The vendors have report data because it is an aid to reviewing the...

@howard-e I was just thinking of another way to explain of how reports are not related to candidate phase. We could have designed the candidate test review page without any...

To what extent is avoiding creating additional vectors for the active finger printing mentioned in section 11 a consideration in the design of this feature? I see some language that...

I don't think we should merge this until we have a functional experimental example in APG as requested in w3c/aria-practices#3070. Is there anyone from ARIA WG who could please prioritize...

The only user agent requirement is: >User Agents SHOULD use the accessible names of elements referenced by aria-actions to determine the names of actions that are exposed in a platform...