Maurizio Cimadamore

> Thanks @mcimadamore for your feedback. Yes, if we can at least group related enum constants together under a separate generated class, that will be awesome. Would it be okay...

> What, in Java, gives you this OR-like functionality for enums? EnumSet! Modelling each enum value as an enum set is certainly possible. It also sounds as overkill. One of...

> > What, in Java, gives you this OR-like functionality for enums? EnumSet! > > Modelling each enum value as an enum set is certainly possible. It also sounds as...

Just to recap solution we have explored previously. It would be nice if, in principle, just doing this: ``` var bar = Foo.a(foo, ); ``` worked, and it invoked the...

> Will the use of ",functional" be the intended way to trigger this > enhancement? I wonder whether last error capture could be built in with > "--include-function funcname,erro" or...

> This proposal makes it nicer to handle invokers. I generated my code with > this change but as you'vr noted it does indeed lead to clashes using the >...

> Now I think about it, renaming the invoker may be necessary after all. > The setter would be useful for applications to fill struct with Java > upcalls to...

> I kept trying to avoid renaming the invoker as I didn't like having the dollar sign or a prefix in the invoker, but I like the idea of having...

> > I kept trying to avoid renaming the invoker as I didn't like having the dollar sign or a prefix in the invoker, but I like the idea of...