Jim McDonald

Although I like the idea of the additional functionality, I think this is starting to overload the function of the withdrawal key; it's moving away from the idea of being...

> Indeed. This would be more like an emergency stop button, to be used once per stake. I do not see how far we are going from the "lock it...

> I still see this as an emergency action meaning "I've lost my key" or "My staking provider has gone offline". The point was that it isn't a "one and...

Could we have a "worry about after phase 0 releases" option? There are various items that would make stakers' lives easier, but I don't see them going in before phase...

Happy to create one, if you're happy with me opening a new issue whilst you're so hard at work closing existing ones down :)

Also worth noting that an increase in `EJECTION_BALANCE` would reduce the time the chain has to wait if not finalizing due to inactive validators going through inactivity leak. This, of...

This is the inactivity leak curve, assuming balance starts at 32 ETH and final inactivity quotient value:  In terms of number of days to hit a given effective...

It would have the same fields as `VoluntaryExit` with additional fields: - pubkey to which to send the funds - signature(withdrawal pubkey, validator pubkey, transfer pubkey)* signed by the withdrawal...

These are *additional* fields, the `VoluntaryExitTo` operation still has to be signed by the validator key as per the standard `VoluntaryExit` operation.

> This means that we simultaneously reduce the over population of attnets by a small number of staking nodes Is this such a terrible thing? Larger staking nodes are often...