Mathieu Boespflug

There is good discussion in haskell-distributed/distributed-process#42, but it's really an issue about network-transport, not distributed-process. So we should reopen the this issue and redirect the discussion in the other issue...

FTR I'm up for removing this function (and its module) altogether. It's not used anywhere so far as I can see.

@qnikst sounds good.

_From @netogallo on December 16, 2012 21:24_ Hi, I am trying to get involved in the development of CH and thought about starting with this issue. I just wanted to...

_From @edsko on December 17, 2012 8:29_ No, `closeConnectionTo` is a purely `Network.Transport` level construct. You'd be working with `Network.Transport` and `Network.Transport.TCP`. You'd also have to think very carefully about...

_From @hyperthunk on December 18, 2012 11:34_ So @edsko it sounds like what we're asking for is a means of tracking all the connections associated with a specific `Endpoint` and...

_From @edsko on December 18, 2012 11:43_ No, I don't think that's the right way to go. You need to add `closeConnectionTo` to `Network.Transport` alright, but nothing else. None of...

_From @edsko on December 18, 2012 11:50_ As regards getting the abstraction right -- you will need to talk to people involved with other kinds of transports. Is it realistic...

_From @hyperthunk on December 18, 2012 11:51_ > None of the above data structures should go there, because different transport implementations might implemented this in entirely different ways. For instance,...

_From @hyperthunk on December 18, 2012 11:53_ > As regards getting the abstraction right -- you will need to talk to people involved with other kinds of transports. Is it...