Mike Gower

I have drafted a response to the WCAG issue. However, this may speak to a lack of context in the ACT template. I believe one of the ways rules are...

> even though it's not valid HTML, there's no negative impact to accessibility that I'm aware of. Philosophically, this puts us in an odd situation where we are beginning to...

@Jym77 my colleague @tombrunet made a similar point to me, so I think my comments on 4.1.1 are off base (but the question on 1.3.5 remains).

> If the purpose is programmatically provided, and practically works in AT (is accessibility supported), This could get messy when we get into 'he said/she said' disputes over where a...

I thought I'd add an example of where I'm encountering this lack of clarity on placeholder as a problem in relation to [Label in Name](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/label-in-name.html), which reads: > For [user...

@scottaohara do you know who we can prod to get some attention on this?