Michael B. Gale

Hi @NiccoloFei 👋 I'll check with the team to see if we have made any changes to the SARIF upload recently that could be responsible for this, but have you...

Hi @kexinoh 👋 Thanks for reporting this problem here. We would probably need a bit more information to debug this. It looks like `query0.ql` etc. may be your own queries?...

Hi @Jamstah 👋 Thanks for reporting this and including the links to the relevant parts of the code and corresponding alerts! That is all very helpful. This is a tricky...

No problem! > I don't know if you want to leave this open or close it, but I won't be offended either way. We do want to leave this open...

Hi @tardigrade-9 👋 Sorry for the late reply, your question seems to have fallen through the cracks last month. Do you have a minimal code example where you would expect...

Hi @onacit! The issue that @aeisenberg linked to is likely what you are running into, but we have made some further improvements to the version selection logic since. I note...

Hi @mikehardy, Sorry this isn't working right for you and agreed the output is a bit nonsensical here. The version selection logic contains hard-coded information about which Java version is...

We just merged the changes late yesterday, so we missed the 2.17.3 release for this by a few days. I'll need to check if they'll make their way into the...

Hi @Piedone 👋 Thank you for this feedback! We have modified our release process so that forthcoming releases should include the version number in the name going forward.

Hi @chenrui333, thank you for providing the extra context! I have reviewed the build log and your PR. The problem here is not directly about CodeQL, but rather that the...