[Bug] System.Exception: LiteDB ENSURE: get only index below highest index

[srinicrick65]

Version We used both 5.0.11 and 5.0.12

Describe the bug We are trying to read the data from the LiteDB Collection using GetEntityCollection and we are getting the below exception

fail: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.DeveloperExceptionPageMiddleware[1] An unhandled exception has occurred while executing the request. System.Exception: LiteDB ENSURE: get only index below highest index at LiteDB.Constants.ENSURE(Boolean conditional, String message) at LiteDB.Engine.BasePage.Get(Byte index) at LiteDB.Engine.DataService.Read(PageAddress address)+MoveNext() at LiteDB.Engine.BufferReader..ctor(IEnumerable1 source, Boolean utcDate) at LiteDB.Engine.DatafileLookup.Load(PageAddress rawId) at LiteDB.Engine.BasePipe.LoadDocument(IEnumerable1 nodes)+MoveNext() at LiteDB.Engine.QueryPipe.Select(IEnumerable1 source, BsonExpression select)+MoveNext() at LiteDB.Engine.QueryExecutor.<>c__DisplayClass10_0.<<ExecuteQuery>g__RunQuery|0>d.MoveNext() at LiteDB.BsonDataReader.Read() at LiteDB.LiteQueryable1.ToDocuments()+MoveNext() at System.Linq.Enumerable.SelectEnumerableIterator2.ToList() at Cloud.IAMMiddleware.DataAccess.LiteDbService1.GetEntityCollection(Int32 pagenumber, Int32 pagesize, String sortParam, String queryParamFilter)

Expected behavior Ideal scenario is it should be fetching the data from the LiteDB.

Screenshots/Stacktrace

[srinicrick65]

Hi Team Can someone provide response this ?

[ProKn1fe]

Some sample code to reproduce? Or at least a data model.

[srinicrick65]

Hi @ProKn1fe We are performing basic CRUD operation . Sample model looks as below .

{
	"_id" : "802d5b66-b35b-483d-ae2b-ac3b09c7de82",
	"tags" : [ ],
	"deletedAt" : 0,
	"ctd" : true,
	"lmd" : 1670658945379,
	"cid" : "eed86ec6-fd4e-4279-b7f2-d7f732b5d62a",
	"scope" : "region",
	"name" : "Ability admin",
	"permissions" : [
		"solution_create",
		"solution_read",
		"solution_write",
		"solution_delete",
		"app_create",
		"app_read",
		"app_write",
		"app_delete",
		"tenant_create",
		"tenant_read",
		"tenant_write",
		"tenant_delete",
		"contract_create",
		"contract_read",
		"contract_write",
		"contract_delete",
		"user_create",
		"user_read",
		"user_write",
		"user_delete",
		"group_create",
		"group_read",
		"group_write",
		"group_delete",
		"identity_provider_create",
		"identity_provider_read",
		"identity_provider_write",
		"identity_provider_delete",
		"connectivity_provider_create",
		"connectivity_provider_read",
		"connectivity_provider_write",
		"connectivity_provider_delete",
		"role_create",
		"role_read",
		"role_write",
		"role_delete",
		"grant_create",
		"grant_read",
		"grant_write",
		"grant_delete",
		"permission_create",
		"permission_read",
		"permission_write",
		"permission_delete",
		"resource_create",
		"resource_read",
		"resource_write",
		"resource_delete",
		"operation_create",
		"operation_read",
		"operation_write",
		"operation_delete",
		"audit_log_read"
	],
	"solutionId" : "30304e0f-af6d-480c-ae94-1d6c136ec94d"
}

[shubhiroy]

Facing similar issue @mbdavid - This issue is a blocker for our release.

[coooool]

I made the same mistake.

[shubhiroy]

What mistake @coooool ?