Matthieu Darbois

@Erotemic, Thanks for the detailed feedback. I'll probably have a look at your fork given I'm currently trying to debug some tests issues on Travis CI using podman and, as...

I'm +1 on this, that was one workflow that made sense to me https://github.com/pypa/cibuildwheel/issues/473#issuecomment-748471250 From the link you provided to multibuild, seems delocate already support this which is good news...

Thanks @henryiii & @ncopa for figuring out a path forward. I will try to do my best to get something in auditwheel (been quite busy at work these days without...

Manylinux images now have cpython 3.11rc1

> Is using -r not an option? the `-r` workaround works fine when using only pip but pipx need to know the package we want binaries for (unless there's a...

> Just a guess, but have you tried passing ‘—spec auditwheel==4.0.0 auditwheel’ to pipx? > I am wondering if this is the issue (it’s not pinned with ==): > pip...

@cs01, IMHO, there's nothing to be done in pipx itself (or it would be an ugly workaround). Just reporting the issue here if someone hits it through pipx rather than...

> Looks like pypa/pip#9020 (comment) @uranusjr, I saw this one but it's closed and https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/9243 seems to be exactly what I'm hitting. > So did the —spec argument work in...

>> Adding constraints to the command-line would work but defeats the purpose of the automation I'm trying to setup (or overly complicates things) > Sorry I was probably too brief....

> patchelf-pypi do not provide wheels for Alpine yes it does > patchelf-pypi do not provide for debian\alpine with armv7 CPU you're right, it doesn't > will adding those dependency...