scikit-posthocs icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
scikit-posthocs copied to clipboard

Multiple Pairwise Comparisons (Post Hoc) Tests in Python

Results 10 scikit-posthocs issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

Thanks for this package! One useful addition (unless I am missing it) would be Dunnett's test comparison to a control.

enhancement
help wanted
check needed

Hi, I often use your `_posthoc_mannwhitneyu` and I get `ValueError 'All numbers are identical in mannwhitneyu'` when two groups are composed from idential numbers. But I thought we should adjust...

bug
check needed

Hi! Thanks a lot for creating this analysis tool. I would like to check if it is normal that a post-hoc analysis using Dunn test, after Kruskal-Wallis, returns no significant...

question
check needed

It seems there are many post-hoc tests implemented and will be really good if there's an easy interface to plot critical difference diagrams with any chosen pairwise tests. In Orange...

enhancement

Hi, I was wondering if there is any chance to include a feature where post hoc results are grouped according to their relationship. I know that in R there are...

enhancement

Hi Maksim! Nice package, thanks for sharing! I am trying to use it and hoping to contribute. Before I use it, I'd like to understand how it is tested. For...

enhancement
help wanted

**Describe the bug** I haven't seen any way to provide alpha (0.05 or 0.1) for plotting critical difference diagram of Nemenyi-Friedman test. I'm trying to follow Demsar's paper [link](https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume7/demsar06a/demsar06a.pdf) and...

bug

I want to perform the Tukey test of comparisons for a subset of pairs. The problem I face is that `scikit_posthocs.posthoc_tukey` works since I am interested in all possible comparisons....

First, thank you very much for this very useful package. **Describe the bug** scikit_posthocs.posthoc_tukey gives unexpected result of '0.001' and '0.900' with one dataset (see below). scipy.stats.tukey_hsd gives similar but...

bug

I think the function for Dunn still counts as sample size the number of scores in the categorical field, even if there is no value in the numerical field, i.e....