Maxime

> Eh I really don't think we should be going to this level of enforcement of type safety I'm not convinced, I think we should. Maybe there's another way of...

> we should come up with a solution that is not requiring NullableProps Why? I do feel like allowing internally the object to be of type `NullableProps` makes sense. In...

Not following up on last comment just sharing another use case for stricter types. The current definition of the `transformToFormGroup` is the following: ```ts protected transformToFormGroup(obj: ControlInterface | null, defaultValues:...

As we may not always have default values to provide, `getDefaultValues` definition is: ```ts protected getDefaultValues(): Partial | null; ``` So it's pretty much the same except that instead of...

> but not at runtime I disagree here as the form could be patched from anywhere really. And it should be perfectly fine patching the form with null values to...

Discussed IRL. Not sure what to do about it but here are some notes: # The issues we have currently - Angular forms are not type safe (ngx-sub-form helps a...

Hi @elvispdosreis could you please provide some code example or maybe a small repro? Thanks

Hi! I'm also really interested in adding a keyboard shortcut to autofix tslint problems. Any news?

@Ruto8 I need to be able to use $http in my actions. How can I do that please ? I do not understand your code but I'm sure I need...

@vko-online thanks ! :+1: