maxbartel

@ScottTodd So I played around with presets a bit and I think the ergonomics from the command line are ok. However I feel like the behavior with the cmake extension...

@ScottTodd I am in the process of updating the PR. I just wanted to ping you because the CUDA tests for example are marked as passed even though they didn't...

@ScottTodd I think this PR is now ready. Enabling CUDA for Aarch64 is now also just a change in an if-statement.

Thanks for the review! I am OOO until Monday and cannot update until then. Just fyi because we also talked about the release this week.

@ScottTodd I will merge now, but it is also end of day in Germany. Please revert if this breaks something.

@stellaraccident Is there a chance that this lands? It nicely decouples the "representation" of Torch in MLIR and the various backends.

I guess this is more a nice to have then a necessity... I think this would be a good idea, but it also seems like there is some work left...

At least in TOSA they are thinking about moving from `I64` to `SI64` (At least for Values). They treat `I64` as a signed integer for historic reasons, but `SI64` is...

@ScottTodd is it possible to run [build_test_all_arm64](https://github.com/iree-org/iree/actions/runs/9363507812/job/25774461685?pr=17564) on this PR? It was skipped. The runtime seems to include CUDA now https://github.com/iree-org/iree/actions/runs/9363507812/job/25774464868?pr=17564#step:9:163

I get the arguments about not building CUDA for every aarch64 source build, but only when building the packages. I will update the PR with the pointer from @ScottTodd. >...