Sebastian Moors

> @mauser, have I misunderstood the use model for the 'build-with-artifacts' branch name as the condition for keeping artifacts? Is there an advantage to using the branch name that I've...

>But the main point of this PR was: Appveyor Windows builds all seem to work now :) And that's definitely good news :) Especially that we can get rid of...

> After some thought, agreed, moving tags is probably less than ideal. Perhaps builds we want to keep artifacts for are rare enough that adding a new tag for each...

Could you provide an screenshot of hydrogen on your device? This would help to get an idea of how the text looks. About the icon: have a look at #417...

The icon file of the hydrogen package is named "h2-icon.xpm"

Ok, i suppose i can't help then.. hydrogen installs itself the file "`h2-icon.svg`" which should scale fine. I can't say where your logo comes from and how your desktop environment...

@elpescado : Yes, that would be possible. About the location of the icons: It irritates me that your link says that gnome looks in `/usr/share/icons/`, but https://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html says: > By...

Hi! good points! The current implementation is quite rough, i was pretty happy to get it ready for the 1.0 release as time was quite short,as always :smile: Just one...

Hi! I've started to look into this pull request. I don't want to merge it for the release of 1.0, but this could be merged after the start of the...

Forgot one thing in my last comment.. You could also add OSC support for the new controls (as well as swing). I suppose OSC support wasn't there when you started...