Maurelian

closed by #144

what did you mean by "tie the rollup driver to submitted outputs" @norswap ?

Could we rename this from "deposit rollup with deposit fees" to simply "deposit fees". AFAICT, there is nothing about this that can't also apply to the sequencer rollup.

@Graciouseats sure, you can imagine a cross chain transaction with a very high `gasLimit`, with zero `data` which calls to this contract: ``` contract Dos { fallback() { uint i;...

@Graciouseats you can find [much more context here](https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/optimistic-specs/discussions/112) if you're more of a prose kind of person. Let's not clutter up this thread more, but we'd be happy to answer...

@norswap We're including this in the release candidate?

> It's a bit dispiriting to start a document with a long list of definitions for which you have absolutely no context. > It's only useful once you already understand...

Optimism v1.0 will have the block hash, which would enable proving a state root: https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/optimistic-specs/blob/701b494896469a0cf31835bb422528caa93d3683/packages/contracts/contracts/L2/L1Block.sol#L18

Looking more closely at the OP, you're also looking to access historical state roots, not just the latest, is that right?

- Just catching up here myself. I really appreciate the interest in unimock, it was fun to build and something I thought there was a need for. That said I...