mv-python
mv-python
> This always seemed a bit dodgy to me because it doesn't create a bound method (because you can't really express that in C). I imagine. I am creating (and...
Hm now I when I am playing more with it it seems that the issue is maybe that Cython supports *only*: * `float complex` * `double complex` * `long double...
OK several observations: 1. `int complex`, `long complex`, `short complex` and `long long complex` types seems to be supported -at least they are in unittests: `tests/run/complex_int_T446.pyx` 2. There is possibility...
I was able to get CI Green but I needed to commented out some tests - see comments above. The PR is still just exploration of the issue. I feel...
OK so now I am able to run all old tests (except one with known bug) **but** I need to comment out the lines https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/5931/files#diff-7aa7c8807c264ac23d9c8bc730950b828d5c5f0ae925dfe2dd4a3c113c1e1ac0R167-R168 which yields following warning (strict...
@da-woods in your PR we are facing the same issue because you are adjusting the type too: https://github.com/da-woods/cython/commit/87f0d8e67#diff-7aa7c8807c264ac23d9c8bc730950b828d5c5f0ae925dfe2dd4a3c113c1e1ac0R168-R169 Is there any real fix to this? @scoder do you have any...
Except one small issue, I did only cosmetics. From the code standpoint, I am fine as it is now. But there is still one missing point - documentation update: https://cython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/userguide/debugging.html#running-the-debugger...
> "let's not change too much more before Cython 3; let's pick this PR up after Cython 3" I agree. I am not going to merge this release **before** Cython...
> Can you elaborate on on which circumstances you need setuptools to run Cython? setuptools is needed when one wants to build shared library. For compiling to .c file setuptools...
> > setuptools is needed when one wants to build shared library. For compiling to .c file setuptools is not needed > I don't think this is correct. If not...